Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Al-bid‘ah versus al-mashlahah al-mursalah and al-istihsân: al-syâthibi’s legal framework
Authors: Asep Saepudin Jahar
Keywords: Al-istihsân;al-bid‘ah;al-mashlahah al-mursalah;faqîh;legal theories
Issue Date: 28-Apr-2016
Series/Report no.: Vol. XII, No. 1, 2012;1-14 hal.
Abstract: This paper discusses with the juridical basis of Abû Ishâq al-Shâthibi’s (d. 790/1388) argument against those who considered al-mashlahah al-mursalah (public interest) and al-istihsân (juristic preference) to be forms of innovation. The present discussion will examine the efficacy of al-Syâthibî’s distinction between al-bid‘ah (innovation), which is foreign and even contradictory to the shariah and the validity of the legal principles of al-mashlahah al-mursalah and al-istihsân as subsidiary, yet valid sources of law under the Quran, the Sunnah, ijmâ’, and qiyâs (ratio legis). In addition, it will be shown how al-Syâthibî’s epistemological reliance on legal theory distinguished him from jurists who shared quite different views on the same matter. In the concluding remarks, the relevance of this theory with contemporary Muslim society with respect to pursuing legal practices is underlined.
ISSN: 14124734
Appears in Collections:Artikel

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Asep Saepudin Jahar.pdfe-Journal547.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in UINJKT-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.